This is supposed to be the "check out" powder-or darn near to it- for almost any bottle-necked cartridge a person could handload. It's the inspiration for countless pet loads, yet I haven't been pleased with the outcomes.
I gave up on it and went to other powder if the new powder was creating extra strain and was slower as opposed to old stuff. I do not keep in mind if I even tried out normal h4831 or not; I'm wondering not. Simply click to broaden...
You might be right they are the same the SC is brief Minimize so it meters much better, I do not Believe you can find just typical 4831 any longer
Along with the 154 grain Hornady SP in the 280, H4831 gave me very good teams and very good velocity, but Rottweil R905 contains a significantly larger velocity and gives marginally greater accuracy. With Swift 150 grain Sciroccos within the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave fantastic precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally better. As a result, in Every single of these cases I went with another powder, but I will surely detest to divest myself of the H4831.
some cartridges are inclined copper foul over Other individuals though, irrespective of how clean the end is to the bore and demand cleaning of the copper fouling a lot more generally.
Did you at any time test H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Taking pictures 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with common chamber. Pondering what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
Anyone loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the h4831 vs h4831sc outcome, any h4831sc load data data you are able to share? Must also point out I've some ELD-X a hundred seventy five's I would like to examination out, When you've got information on that as well.
Like claimed previously mentioned, exact same things. All that is different is the scale of your kernels. I did hear somewhere that they are going to only make the SC in the future. I don't know if that is certainly correct or not but would seem sensible to me. I exploit SC since that is what I present in the 8 lb jug and it works.
dioni.a.312 explained: In my expertise the sole genuine difference is that the shortcut meters much better through reloading machines. The moment It truly is loaded theres no practical difference. I have heard which the shortcut could have a small little bit more rapidly burn level but It appears insignificant. Click on to broaden...
Validate YOUR AGE Specific states prohibit promotion or promoting of firearms, ammunition, and connected firearm factors to minors. We’d like to make certain you’re eighteen a long time of age or older in advance of enabling you to buy our website. Will you be 18 a long time of age or more mature?
Run your load up with the particular powder (sc or normal) and ton you might be applying even though. Same burn up charge does not imply it'll behave "particularly" exactly the same. I have found above a hundred fps distinction between sc and h4831sc mil-surp a lot of H4831.
It is really likely that no even further dialogue is required, wherein circumstance we endorse starting a fresh thread. If even so you are feeling your reaction is necessary you'll be able to even now do this.
arkansas or ohio i in no way observed a distinction besides the regular is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan.
I found that my 7mag 160 partitions were being sub MOA with 4831sc with very low to min fees. I’m speaking 2700 (maybe 2800) fps, it absolutely was a lower 60s grain charge inside of a Norma scenario. Not what I was looking for, but exact Nevertheless.